One of the university's main goals was to open up content management beyond the central digital team. Faculty staff needed to create and update their own content, but within guardrails that maintained quality and consistency.
We ran workshops with stakeholders across the university to map out how content flows from creation to publication. From those sessions we designed a role-based editorial workflow with four tiers, from content authors through faculty managers to publishers and administrators, each with carefully scoped permissions.
We implemented the Group and Content Access modules to create editing silos so faculty teams could only access their own content. The Workflow module introduced proper draft, review and approval states, along with scheduled publishing. Content versioning meant changes could be previewed and rolled back.
We replaced the sluggish Paragraphs-based editing interface with Layout Builder, giving editors a more visual page-building experience. Editorial pages that had previously taken several seconds to load became responsive and usable. Faculty teams could actually get on with managing their content.